← Retour aux ressources
Anglais (LVA) · Classe de Terminale

Science, éthique et progrès

Axe culturel 3 — Art et pouvoir : innovation scientifique, responsabilité et limites éthiques dans le monde anglophone (programme de Tle, LVA)

À propos de cette page
Cette évaluation sur « Science, éthique et progrès » en terminale permet de faire le point sur ses connaissances en anglais (lva), comme lors d'un véritable contrôle. Elle suit le programme officiel de terminale et propose plusieurs exercices notés sur 20, avec un corrigé détaillé. Au programme : Science, ethics and progress: framing the debate, Milestones of scientific progress, Artificial intelligence: promise and peril, Bioethics: genetics, medicine and the body. Travaille seul, chronomètre-toi, puis compare tes réponses au corrigé pour identifier les points à revoir. Parfait pour mesurer ses progrès et réviser efficacement. Évaluation gratuite conçue par un professeur particulier à Marseille pour aider les élèves de terminale en anglais (lva).
Évaluation finale · Niveau difficile · Durée 60 min · Noté sur 20
60:00

Évaluation complète de fin de chapitre, tout en niveau difficile. Travaille seul et sans aide, puis vérifie tes réponses avec le corrigé détaillé dépliable en bas de page.

Exercice 1 — Reading comprehension

/ 10 pts
  1. Read the text, then answer in English (justify with quotes when asked).
    My grandfather was a nuclear physicist. He helped design reactors that lit up entire cities, and he was proud of it until the day a power plant failed and people had to flee their homes. 'We built a sun in a box,' he once told me, 'and we forgot that the sun can burn.' For the rest of his life he campaigned for stricter safety rules.

    I became a scientist too, but I work on solar panels. People call my field 'clean', yet I know that no technology is innocent: the metals we use are mined in harsh conditions, and the old panels will one day become waste. My grandfather taught me the most important lesson of all: a scientist must never ask only 'can I build this?' but also 'should I, and at what cost?' Progress is not a straight line towards a better world. It is a series of choices, and every choice has a price. Our duty is to choose with our eyes open.
  2. 1. What was the grandfather's job, and what was he proud of? (1 pt)
  3. 2. Quote the text: what event changed his attitude? (2 pts)
  4. 3. Explain the metaphor 'We built a sun in a box… the sun can burn.' (2 pts)
  5. 4. Why does the narrator say that solar energy is not totally 'innocent'? Give one reason. (2 pts)
  6. 5. In your own words, explain the lesson the grandfather taught about progress. (3 pts)

Exercice 2 — Written expression

/ 10 pts
  1. Choose ONE subject and write about 120-150 words in English.
  2. A. 'Every scientific breakthrough should be allowed in the name of progress.' To what extent do you agree? Discuss with examples.
  3. B. Imagine the year 2050. Write a short text describing one technology that has changed daily life, weighing its benefits and its ethical risks.
  4. You will be assessed on: relevance of ideas, richness of vocabulary (science & ethics lexicon), accuracy of grammar (modals, future, conditionals, connectors) and structure.
Corrigé détaillé

Exercice 1 — Reading comprehension
Corrigé : 1) He was a nuclear physicist who 'helped design reactors that lit up entire cities'; he was proud of giving light/energy to cities. 2) A turning point: 'the day a power plant failed and people had to flee their homes' (a nuclear accident). 3) The 'sun in a box' = nuclear power, an immense and life-giving energy; but 'the sun can burn' = that same power is dangerous and can destroy. The metaphor warns that a great benefit is also a great risk. 4) Solar energy is not 'innocent' because 'the metals we use are mined in harsh conditions' and 'the old panels will one day become waste' (any one reason). 5) Progress is not automatically good ('not a straight line towards a better world'): it is a series of choices with a cost. A scientist must ask not only 'can I build this?' but 'should I, and at what cost?' — i.e. act with responsibility and foresight ('choose with our eyes open'). Reward any nuanced, well-supported answer.

Exercice 2 — Written expression
Corrigé — expected points: a clear thesis and nuanced argumentation (for / against / personal opinion); use of connectors (however, moreover, on balance); chapter vocabulary (breakthrough, genetic engineering, AI, accountability, precautionary principle); correct modals (must, should, could, might), future and conditionals; at least two concrete examples.

Sample (subject A): "It is often argued that every scientific breakthrough should be allowed in the name of progress. I partly agree: science has cured diseases, fed billions and may soon solve the climate crisis, so we must not block research out of fear. However, history shows that progress without limits can be dangerous. The atomic bomb gave us the power to destroy ourselves, and today AI could be used for mass surveillance if it is not regulated. Moreover, just because we can edit human genes does not mean we should. On balance, I believe breakthroughs should be encouraged but framed by ethics and the precautionary principle. A scientist must always ask not only 'can I?' but 'should I?'. Responsibility, not fear, should guide progress." (≈135 words) Reward structure, examples and accurate language.

Continuer ce chapitre
Autres chapitres
Bloqué sur ce chapitre ?

Cours particuliers de anglais (lva) à Marseille, en présentiel ou à distance — un prof qui s'adapte à ton rythme et reprend ce qui coince.

Réserver un 1er cours → Voir les tarifs